Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study investigates the benefits of designing second language (L2) learning tasks to operate on learner-generated content (related to actual content in their lives and experiences) as opposed to teacher-generated content typical of current approaches to L2 task design (fictitious ideas and events created to provide an opportunity for meaningful language use). Thirty-two Japanese learners completed parallel versions of narrative tasks, which operated on learner-generated content and teacher-generated content respectively. Learner engagement in L2 use was measured in terms of behavioral, cognitive, and social components: behavioral engagement was measured in terms of effort and persistence in task completion; cognitive engagement in terms of attention to elaborating and clarifying content; and social engagement in terms of participants’ affiliation in the discourse. Results indicate that tasks operating on learner-generated as opposed to teacher-generated content had positive effects on all aspects of engagement in L2 use during task performance. Furthermore, participants’ affective responses to the respective conditions as reflected in a post-performance questionnaire corroborated the results for performance. This indicates that learners were also more affectively engaged in the performance of the tasks in the learner-generated content condition than they were in those in the teacher-generated content condition.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Craig Lambert
Jenefer Philp
Sachiko Nakamura
Language Teaching Research
Lancaster University
Curtin University
Anaheim University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lambert et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9a75f1ad561c673684e80 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816683559