Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of pre-diabetes mellitus and its consequences in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction are not known. We investigated these in the Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined clinical outcomes in 8399 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction according to history of diabetes mellitus and glycemic status (baseline hemoglobin A1c HbA1c: 6.5%) and known diabetes mellitus compared with those with HbA1c < 6.0% was 1.39 (1.17-1.64); P < 0.001 and 1.64 (1.43-1.87); P < 0.001, respectively. Patients with pre-diabetes mellitus were also at higher risk (hazard ratio, 1.27 1.10-1.47; P < 0.001) compared with those with HbA1c < 6.0%. The benefit of LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan) compared with enalapril was consistent across the range of HbA1c in the trial. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, dysglycemia is common and pre-diabetes mellitus is associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (compared with patients with no diabetes mellitus and HbA1c < 6.0%). LCZ696 was beneficial compared with enalapril, irrespective of glycemic status. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01035255.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Søren Lund Kristensen
Heart Failure & Transplant
David Preiss
General / Preventive / Lipids
Pardeep S. Jhund
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Circulation Heart Failure
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kristensen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0c94cae28175e95a2369eb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.115.002560
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: