Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Over the past 100 years, research on job attitudes has improved in the sophistication of methods and in the productive use of theory as a basis for fundamental research into questions of work psychology. Early research incorporated a diversity of methods for measuring potential predictors and outcomes of job attitudes. Over time, methods for statistically assessing these relationships became more rigorous, but the field also became narrower. In recent years, developments in theory and methodology have reinvigorated research, which now addresses a rich panoply of topics related to the daily flow of affect, the complexity of personal motives and dispositions, and the complex interplay of attitude objects and motivation in shaping behavior. Despite these apparent changes, a review of the concepts and substantive arguments that underpin this literature have remained remarkably consistent. We conclude by discussing how we expect that these major themes will be addressed in the future, emphasizing topics that have proven to be enduring guides for understanding the ways that people construe and react to their appraisals of their work. (PsycINFO Database Record
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Timothy A. Judge
University of Mendoza
Howard M. Weiss
Pennsylvania State University
John D. Kammeyer‐Mueller
University of Minnesota
Journal of Applied Psychology
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
The Ohio State University
Georgia Institute of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Judge et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbb2ed78a3e0e28868562c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000181
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: