What are the strongest clinical, biochemical, haemodynamic, and echocardiographic predictors of right ventricular failure after LVAD implantation?
4,428 patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation pooled from 36 observational studies
Presence of clinical, biochemical, haemodynamic, and echocardiographic risk factors (e.g., mechanical ventilation, CRRT, elevated INR, NT-proBNP, CVP, low RVSWI, RV dysfunction)
Absence of these risk factors (No-RVF populations)
Right ventricular failure (RVF) after LVAD implantationhard clinical
Patients requiring ventilatory support or CRRT, as well as those with elevated CVP, low RVSWI, and pre-implant RV dysfunction, are at high risk for right ventricular failure following LVAD implantation.
Right ventricular failure (RVF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but the identification of LVAD candidates at risk for RVF remains challenging. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies of risk factors associated with RVF after LVAD implant. Thirty-six studies published between 1 January 1995 and 30 April 2015, comprising 995 RVF patients out of a pooled final population of 4428 patients, were identified. Meta-analysed prevalence of post-LVAD RVF was 35%. A need for mechanical ventilation odds ratio (OR) 2.99, or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT; OR 4.61, area under the curve 0.78, specificity 0.91) were the clinical variables with the highest effect size (ES) in predicting RVF. International normalized ratio INR; standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.49 and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (SMD 0.52) were the biochemical markers that best discriminated between RVF and No-RVF populations, though NT-proBNP was highly heterogeneous. Right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI) and central venous pressure (CVP) (SMD -0.58 and 0.47, respectively) were the haemodynamic measures with the highest ES in identifying patients at risk of post-LVAD RVF; CVP was particularly useful in risk stratifying patients undergoing continuous-flow LVAD implant (SMD 0.59, P 2 = 20.9%). Finally, pre-implant moderate to severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, as assessed qualitatively (OR 2.82), or a greater RV/LV diameter ratio (SMD 0.51) were the standard echocardiographic measurements with the highest ES in comparing RVF with No-RVF patients. Longitudinal systolic strain of the RV free wall had the highest ES (SMD 0.73) but also the greatest heterogeneity (I2 = 74%) and was thus only marginally significant (P = 0.05). Patients on ventilatory support or CRRT are at high risk for post-LVAD RVF, similarly to patients with slightly increased INR, high NT-proBNP or leukocytosis. High CVP, low RVSWI, an enlarged right ventricle with concomitant low RV strain also identify patients at higher risk.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Diego Bellavia
Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione
Attilio Iacovoni
Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII
Cesare Scardulla
Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione
European Journal of Heart Failure
Mayo Clinic
University of Milano-Bicocca
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bellavia et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69df8b42915fa04953614de3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.733
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: