Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract We illustrate how partial identification methods can be used to provide credible inferences on the causal impacts of food assistance programs, focusing on the impact that the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as the Food Stamp Program) has on food insecurity among households with children. Recent research applies these methods to address two key issues confounding identification: missing counterfactuals and nonrandomly misclassified treatment status. In this paper, we illustrate and extend the recent literature by using data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) to study the robustness of prior conclusions. The SIPP confers important advantages: the detailed information about income and eligibility allows us to apply a modified discontinuity design to sharpen inferences, and the panel nature allows us to reduce uncertainty about true participation status. We find that SNAP reduces the prevalence of food insecurity in households with children by at least six percentage points.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Craig Gundersen
Manitoba Health
Brent Kreider
Iowa State University
John V. Pepper
University of Virginia
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
University of Virginia
Iowa State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gundersen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d748ccaa68b335b4f30d74 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aax026
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: