High estimated cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with a 29% lower risk of experiencing a coronary heart disease event compared to low estimated cardiorespiratory fitness in asymptomatic men (HR 0.71).
Cohort (n=29,854)
No
Asymptomatic men (n=29,854)
High estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (e-CRF) vs Low estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (e-CRF)
Incident coronary heart disease (CHD) — HR 0.71 (0.56-0.88), p=0.003
Effect estimate: HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.56-0.88)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.4% vs 1.8%
p-value: p=0.003
The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) was developed to quantify a patient's coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Non-exercise estimated CRF (e-CRF) may provide a clinically practical method for describing cardiorespiratory fitness. We computed e-CRF and tested its association with the FRS and CHD. Male participants (n = 29,854) in the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study (ACLS) who completed a baseline examination between 1979-2002 were followed for 12 years to determine incident CHD defined by self-report of myocardial infarction, revascularization, or CHD mortality. e-CRF was defined from a 7-item scale and categorized using age-specific tertiles. Multivariable survival analysis determined associations between FRS, e-CRF, and CHD. Interaction between e-CRF and FRS was tested by stratified analysis by 'low' and 'moderate or high' 10-year CHD risk. Men with high e-CRF were significantly (p-value < 0.0001) younger, and less likely to be smokers, compared to men with low e-CRF. Multivariable survival analysis reported men with high e-CRF were 29% (HR = 0.71; 95% 0.56, 0.88) less likely to experience a CHD event compared to men with low e-CRF. Stratified analyses showed men with 'low' 10-year FRS predicted CHD risk and high e-CRF had a 28% (HR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.57, 0.91) lower CHD-mortality risk compared to men with low e-CRF, no association was found in this group and men with moderate e-CRF. Men who were more fit had a decreased risk for CHD compared to men in the lowest third of fitness. Estimated CRF may add clinical value to the FRS and help clinicians better predict long-term CHD risk.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jennifer C. Gander
Kaiser Permanente
Xuemei Sui
Preventive Cardiology
James R. Hébert
Preventive Cardiology
Preventive Medicine Reports
Emory University
University of South Carolina
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gander et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Asymptomatic men (n=29,854). High estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (e-CRF) vs. Low estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (e-CRF) was evaluated on Incident coronary heart disease (CHD) (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.88, p=0.003). High estimated cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with a 29% lower risk of experiencing a coronary heart disease event compared to low estimated cardiorespiratory fitness in asymptomatic men (HR 0.71).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c0749fc87fd06169cffe8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.05.008
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: