Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Dual-energy CT has remained underutilized over the past decade probably due to a cumbersome workflow issue and current technical limitations. Clinical radiologists should be made aware of the potential clinical benefits of dual-energy CT over single-energy CT. To accomplish this aim, the basic principle, current acquisition methods with advantages and disadvantages, and various material-specific imaging methods as clinical applications of dual-energy CT should be addressed in detail. Current dual-energy CT acquisition methods include dual tubes with or without beam filtration, rapid voltage switching, dual-layer detector, split filter technique, and sequential scanning. Dual-energy material-specific imaging methods include virtual monoenergetic or monochromatic imaging, effective atomic number map, virtual non-contrast or unenhanced imaging, virtual non-calcium imaging, iodine map, inhaled xenon map, uric acid imaging, automatic bone removal, and lung vessels analysis. In this review, we focus on dual-energy CT imaging including related issues of radiation exposure to patients, scanning and post-processing options, and potential clinical benefits mainly to improve the understanding of clinical radiologists and thus, expand the clinical use of dual-energy CT; in addition, we briefly describe the current technical limitations of dual-energy CT and the current developments of photon-counting detector.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hyun Woo Goo
Jin Mo Goo
Korean Journal of Radiology
Seoul National University
University of Ulsan
Asan Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Goo et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d77e33447a5ff6a2b8a926 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.555
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: