Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The ever-increasing application of algorithms to decision-making in a range of social contexts has prompted demands for algorithmic accountability. Accountable decision-makers must provide their decision-subjects with justifications for their automated system's outputs, but what kinds of broader principles should we expect such justifications to appeal to? Drawing from political philosophy, I present an account of algorithmic accountability in terms of the democratic ideal of 'public reason'. I argue that situating demands for algorithmic accountability within this justificatory framework enables us to better articulate their purpose and assess the adequacy of efforts toward them.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Reuben Binns
Philosophy & Technology
University of Oxford
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Reuben Binns (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8163661e2ce1627d18c33 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5