Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Key scholars have lauded benefits of integrating mixed methods and grounded theory—or mixed methods–grounded theory (MM-GT)—yet there have been few attempts to ascertain in what ways researchers use MM-GT. Our aim was to systematically, but not exhaustively, examine applications of MM-GT and offer procedural guidelines. We identified 61 empirical MM-GT articles and developed a codebook for analysis. MM-GT was widely used across disciplines. Most published MM-GT provided little methodological detail regarding grounded theory, mixed methods, and their integration; theoretical development was noticeably absent; and the majority followed a convergent mixed methods design. This inquiry contributes to emerging discussions regarding the ways in which MM-GT can or should be used to more fully realize the potential of this approach.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Timothy C. Guetterman
University of Michigan
Wayne A. Babchuk
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Michelle Howell Smith
Nebraska Medical Center
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
University of Michigan
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Guetterman et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd39c57808b00a4799b8c0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817710877
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: