Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Identifying public misinformation is a complicated and challenging task. An important part of checking the veracity of a specific claim is to evaluate the stance different news sources take towards the assertion. Automatic stance evaluation, i.e. stance detection, would arguably facilitate the process of fact checking. In this paper, we present our stance detection system which claimed third place in Stage 1 of the Fake News Challenge. Despite our straightforward approach, our system performs at a competitive level with the complex ensembles of the top two winning teams. We therefore propose our system as the 'simple but tough-to-beat baseline' for the Fake News Challenge stance detection task.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Benjamin Riedel
Isabelle Augenstein
University of Copenhagen
Georgios Spithourakis
National Technical University of Athens
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Riedel et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f2d3a4045c7e590426db0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1707.03264
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: