Co-production is a risky method of social inquiry. It is time-consuming, ethically complex, emotionally demanding, inherently unstable, vulnerable to external shocks, subject to competing demands and it challenges many disciplinary norms. This is what makes it so fresh and innovative. And yet these research-related risks are rarely discussed and, as a result, risk-reduction strategies remain under-developed within training and research processes. It is for exactly this reason that this article draws upon Mary Douglas’s notion of ‘social pollution’ in order to understand the tensions and challenges of co-production. It seeks to expose the generally hidden politics of co-production.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Matthew Flinders
University of Sheffield
Matthew Wood
School of International Relations
Malaika Cunningham
University of London
Evidence & Policy
University of Sheffield
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Flinders et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d97193387cf7069868413a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/174426415x14412037949967
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: