Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract BACKGROUND In the present study, two contrasting stamnagathi ( Cichorium spinosum L.) ecotypes originating either from a mountainous or from a seaside habitat were grown hydroponically and supplied with a nutrient solution differing in the total‐N level (4 or 16 mmol L –1 ) and the N source (NH 4 + ‐N/total‐N: 0.05, 0.25 or 0.50). The aim was to search for genotypic differences in nitrogen nutrition. RESULTS At commercial maturity, the dry weight of mountainous plants was higher than that of seaside plants. The shoot mineral concentrations were higher in seaside plants than in mountainous plants in both harvests. The leaf nitrate concentration was influenced by the levels of both total‐N and NH 4 + ‐N/total‐N at both harvests, whereas plants with a seaside origin exhibited higher nitrate concentrations than those originating from a mountainous site in all total‐N and NH 4 + ‐N/total‐N treatments. CONCLUSION The two stamnagathi ecotypes differed considerably in their responses to nitrogen nutrition and tissue nitrate content. The mountainous ecotype was superior in terms of growth, tissue nitrate concentration and antioxidant capacity, whereas the seaside ecotype accumulated more nutrient microcations in leaves. A low total‐N concentration (up to 4 mmol L –1 ) combined with a high NH 4 + ‐N/total‐N ratio (up to 0.05) could minimize tissue NO 3 – concentrations without compromising yield. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry
Chatzigianni et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: