Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the perception of public housing associated with its necessary, supply, and types by family life cycle to provide implications and suggestions. For empirical analysis, family life cycle was classified into four types: emerging family, family formation, family with school-age children, and family contraction. Difference in life cycle perception was analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan post hoc analysis. As a result, this study confirmed that family with school-age children had the most negative view on public housing. In addition, family formation and family contraction showed high need for public housing. Moreover, it is necessary to actively improve educational and residential environments through developing public housing because families with school-age children considered that educational and residential environments from public housing development had significantly negative impact on their children. Since family formation and family contraction typically tend to have high interest in public housing to meet the needs of life cycle, it is necessary to pursue customized public housing policy that can actively reflect the interests of each life cycle. In addition, public housing and management policies are needed to improve public housing awareness.
Lee et al. (Thu,) studied this question.