Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Digital technologies in health care are expected to increase in scope and to affect ever more parts of the health care system. It is important to enhance the knowledge of whether new digital methods and innovations provide value for money compared with traditional models of care. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate whether a digital health care model for primary care is a less costly alternative compared with traditional in-office primary care in Sweden. METHODS: Cost data for the two care models were collected and analyzed to obtain a measure in local currency per care contact. RESULTS: The comparison showed that the total economic cost of a digital consultation is 1960 Swedish krona (SEK) (SEK100 = US11. 29; February 2017) compared with SEK3348 for a traditional consultation at a health care clinic. Cost differences arose on both the provider side and on the user side. CONCLUSION: The digital health care model may be a less costly alternative to the traditional health care model. Depending on the rate of digital substitution, gross economic cost savings of between SEK1 billion and SEK10 billion per year could be realized if more digital consultations were made. Further studies are needed to validate the findings, assess the types of care most suitable for digital care, and also to obtain various quality-adjusted outcome measures.
Björn Ekman (Fri,) studied this question.