A ballistocardiographic sensor foil coupled with a novel algorithm accurately detected beat-to-beat cycle length compared to ECG, achieving a correlation of rs = 0.95 after filtering for signal quality.
Observational (n=21)
No
Does unobtrusive nocturnal heartbeat monitoring by a ballistocardiographic sensor foil accurately detect beat-to-beat cycle length compared to ECG in patients with sleep disordered breathing?
A novel algorithm coupled with a ballistocardiographic sensor foil provides good correlation of beat-to-beat cycle length detection with simultaneously recorded ECG, offering a potential unobtrusive alternative for heart rate monitoring.
Effect estimate: rs = 0.77
Abstract Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is known for fluctuating heart rates and an increased risk of developing arrhythmias. The current reference for heartbeat analysis is an electrocardiogram (ECG). As an unobtrusive alternative, we tested a sensor foil for mechanical vibrations to perform a ballistocardiography (BCG) and applied a novel algorithm for beat-to-beat cycle length detection. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between beat-to-beat cycle length detection by the BCG algorithm and simultaneously recorded ECG. In 21 patients suspected for SDB undergoing polysomnography, we compared ECG to simultaneously recorded BCG data analysed by our algorithm. We analysed 362.040 heartbeats during a total of 93 hours of recording. The baseline beat-to-beat cycle length correlation between BCG and ECG was r s = 0.77 (n = 362040) with a mean absolute difference of 15 ± 162 ms (mean cycle length: ECG 923 ± 220 ms; BCG 908 ± 203 ms). After filtering artefacts and improving signal quality by our algorithm, the correlation increased to r s = 0.95 (n = 235367) with a mean absolute difference in cycle length of 4 ± 72 ms (ECG 920 ± 196 ms; BCG 916 ± 194 ms). We conclude that our algorithm, coupled with a BCG sensor foil provides good correlation of beat-to-beat cycle length detection with simultaneously recorded ECG.
Zink et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Sleep Disordered Breathing (n=21). Ballistocardiographic (BCG) sensor foil vs. Electrocardiogram (ECG) was evaluated on Beat-to-beat cycle length correlation between BCG and ECG (rs = 0.77). A ballistocardiographic sensor foil coupled with a novel algorithm accurately detected beat-to-beat cycle length compared to ECG, achieving a correlation of rs = 0.95 after filtering for signal quality.