Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
, satisfaction scores and complications. Thirty participants were allocated to each group. Baseline patient characteristics, procedure time and anaesthetic agents used were similar between the groups. Desaturation occurred in 4 out of 30 patients allocated to the high-flow nasal oxygen group, compared with 10 out of 30 allocated to the standard oxygenation group, a non-significant difference (p = 0.07) with intention to treat analysis. The difference was significant (p = 0.047) when using a per-protocol analysis. Oxygen saturation after pre-oxygenation and the lowest oxygen saturation during procedure were significantly higher in the high-flow nasal oxygen group compared with the standard oxygenation group; median (IQR range 100 (99-100 93-100) vs. 98 (97-99 94-100), p = 0.0001 and 97.5 (94-99 77-100) vs. 92 (88-95 79-98), p < 0.001, respectively. There were no differences in other secondary outcomes. Although high-flow nasal oxygen may prevent desaturation due to some causes, it does not protect against hypoxaemia in all circumstances.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ned Douglas
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Irene Ng
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
F. Nazeem
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Anaesthesia
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Douglas et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69fc3467de469b6f91fa3d31 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14156