Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: To train a generic deep learning software (DLS) to classify breast cancer on ultrasound images and to compare its performance to human readers with variable breast imaging experience. METHODS: In this retrospective study, all breast ultrasound examinations from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 at our institution were reviewed. Patients with post-surgical scars, initially indeterminate, or malignant lesions with histological diagnoses or 2-year follow-up were included. The DLS was trained with 70% of the images, and the remaining 30% were used to validate the performance. Three readers with variable expertise also evaluated the validation set (radiologist, resident, medical student). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed with a receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: 82 patients with malignant and 550 with benign lesions were included. Time needed for training was 7 min (DLS). Evaluation time for the test data set were 3.7 s (DLS) and 28, 22 and 25 min for human readers (decreasing experience). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed non-significant differences (p-values 0.45-0.47) in the area under the curve of 0.84 (DLS), 0.88 (experienced and intermediate readers) and 0.79 (inexperienced reader). CONCLUSION: DLS may aid diagnosing cancer on breast ultrasound images with an accuracy comparable to radiologists, and learns better and faster than a human reader with no prior experience. Further clinical trials with dedicated algorithms are warranted. Advances in knowledge: DLS can be trained classify cancer on breast ultrasound images high accuracy even with comparably few training cases. The fast evaluation speed makes real-time image analysis feasible.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Anton S. Becker
NYU Langone Health
Michael Mueller
University of Chicago
Elina Stoffel
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
British Journal of Radiology
University Hospital of Zurich
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Becker et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a016b879a2e43537548dfa3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170576
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: