Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In most countries, a standard (or core) model of employment relationship (i.e. full-time work under an open-ended employment contract) typically receives the greatest labour and social security protection, with divergent work arrangements receiving less protection in correlation to the magnitude of the differences between the former and the latter. However, recent developments concerning non-standard forms of work may question this dynamic. In this article, we examine the nature and current evolution of the standard employment relationship, then analyse how other forms of work deviate from this standard. In order to do so, we draw on the conclusions of the numerous studies recently published by scholars and international organisations in the wake of the growing public debate on the ‘new world of work’. Afterwards, we analyse the situation of non-standard workers under certain social security systems, in order to determine how those systems have approached the divergent character of these forms of work. This leads us to identify the main challenges that social security systems experience when faced with non-standard forms of work. The article concludes by addressing the need to adapt the basic principles of social security to the atypical features of non-standard work.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paul Schoukens
Tilburg University
Alberto Barrio
University of Copenhagen
European Labour Law Journal
KU Leuven
Tilburg University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schoukens et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20904cfd0964e87e4d19ec — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952517743871