Cardiac rehabilitation referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome were low overall but higher in Porto (32.3% and 26.2%) than the north-east region (10.7% and 7.1%).
Cohort (n=939)
Yes
What are the rates and determinants of cardiac rehabilitation referral and participation among patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Cardiac rehabilitation is significantly underutilized in Portugal following acute coronary syndrome, with major regional disparities driven by distance, cost, and perceived lack of benefit.
Absolute Event Rate: 32.3% vs 10.7%
OBJECTIVES: To estimate cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to identify their determinants, in two Portuguese regions. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Patients consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of two hospitals, one in the district of Porto and one in the north-east region (NER) of Portugal, were enrolled in the EPIHeart cohort and then followed up for 6 months. PARTICIPANTS: Between August 2013 and December 2014, 939 patients were included in the cohort, and 853 were re-evaluated at 6-month follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Referral rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who were referred to a CR programme, whereas participation rate was defined as the proportion of eligible patients who completed a CR programme, as was recommended by their physicians. RESULTS: Patients referred were 32.3% and 10.7% of those eligible in Porto and NER, respectively. In both regions, referral to CR decreased with age and with longer travel times to CR centres and increased with education or social class. At follow-up, 128 patients from Porto (26.2% of those eligible and 81.0% of those referred) and 26 from NER (7.1% of those eligible and 66.7% of those referred) reported actually participating in a CR programme. In Porto, the main barriers to participation were the long time until a programme was available and lack of perceived benefit. Patients in NER identified distance to CR and costs as the main barriers. CONCLUSIONS: CR remains clearly underused in Portugal, with major inequalities in access between regions. Achieving equitable and greater use of CR requires a multilevel approach addressing barriers related to healthcare system, providers and patients in order to improve provision, referral and participation.
Viana et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in acute coronary syndrome (n=939). Cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Cardiac rehabilitation referral rate. Cardiac rehabilitation referral and participation rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome were low overall but higher in Porto (32.3% and 26.2%) than the north-east region (10.7% and 7.1%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: