A mathematical model of blood flow in 55 arteries accurately reproduced clinically measured radial pressure waveforms in healthy individuals with a mean absolute percentage error of 1.87%.
Cross-Sectional (n=20)
No
A subject-specific 55-artery mathematical model can accurately reproduce peripheral pressure waveforms and derive central hemodynamic indices, offering a computational tool to investigate cardiovascular abnormalities.
Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide. Pulse wave analysis (PWA) technique, which reconstructs and analyses aortic pressure waveform based on non-invasive peripheral pressure recording, became an important bioassay for cardiovascular assessment in a general population. The aim of our study was to establish a pulse wave propagation modeling framework capable of matching clinical PWA data from healthy individuals on a per-subject basis. Radial pressure profiles from 20 healthy individuals (10 males, 10 females), with mean age of 42 ± 10 years, were recorded using applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor, AtCor Medical, Australia) and used to estimate subject-specific parameters of mathematical model of blood flow in the system of fifty-five arteries. The model was able to describe recorded pressure profiles with high accuracy (mean absolute percentage error of 1.87 ± 0.75%) when estimating only 6 parameters for each subject. Cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) have been correctly identified by the model as lower in females than males (CO of 3.57 ± 0.54 vs. 4.18 ± 0.72 L/min with p-value 0.99 and r > 0.97 for systolic (SP) and diastolic (DP) pressures, respectively; r > 0.77 for augmentation index (AI); all p-values < 0.01). Model-predicted central waveforms, however, had higher SP than those reconstructed by PWA using recorded radial waves (5.6 ± 3.3 mmHg on average). From all estimated subject-specific parameters only the time to the peak of heart ejection profile correlated with clinically measured AI. Our study suggests that the proposed model may serve as a tool to computationally investigate virtual patient scenarios mimicking different cardiovascular abnormalities. Such a framework can augment our understanding and help with the interpretation of PWA results.
Poleszczuk et al. (Thu,) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=20). Subject-specific pulse wave propagation modeling was evaluated on Mean absolute percentage error of model-predicted radial pressure waveforms compared to clinical recordings. A mathematical model of blood flow in 55 arteries accurately reproduced clinically measured radial pressure waveforms in healthy individuals with a mean absolute percentage error of 1.87%.