Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Reducing firm environmental burden is not easy. Thus, several studies have investigated the antecedents of good firm environmental performance; however, they provide contrasting results, focus on specific categories of antecedents, and often rely on subjective performance measures. This study overcomes these gaps by jointly considering the effects of different firm strategic and organizational orientations on several dimensions of environmental performance, objectively measured. Through the analysis of 269 large global companies included in the Newsweek Green Ranking 2014 , we found that: both market and environmental management orientations have a positive effect on carbon, energy, and water productivity; green supply chain management orientation has a positive influence on waste and water productivity; and technology orientation negatively affects carbon and waste productivity. Based on these findings, we advise managers that strategic and organizational orientations do not affect all types of environmental performance in the same way, thus calling for caution when they are designed for environmentally friendly purposes. Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lorenzo Ardito
Polytechnic University of Bari
Rosa Maria Dangelico
Polytechnic University of Bari
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Sapienza University of Rome
Polytechnic University of Bari
Policlinico Umberto I
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ardito et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e2c7eecd16f9b081f906b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1470
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: