Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Recently, 'Liquid crystal display (LCD) vs. organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display: who wins?' has become a topic of heated debate. In this review, we perform a systematic and comparative study of these two flat panel display technologies. First, we review recent advances in LCDs and OLEDs, including material development, device configuration and system integration. Next we analyze and compare their performances by six key display metrics: response time, contrast ratio, color gamut, lifetime, power efficiency, and panel flexibility. In this section, we focus on two key parameters: motion picture response time (MPRT) and ambient contrast ratio (ACR), which dramatically affect image quality in practical application scenarios. MPRT determines the image blur of a moving picture, and ACR governs the perceived image contrast under ambient lighting conditions. It is intriguing that LCD can achieve comparable or even slightly better MPRT and ACR than OLED, although its response time and contrast ratio are generally perceived to be much inferior to those of OLED. Finally, three future trends are highlighted, including high dynamic range, virtual reality/augmented reality and smart displays with versatile functions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hai-Wei Chen
University of Central Florida
Jiun‐Haw Lee
Kyushu University
Bo-Yen Lin
Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Light Science & Applications
National Taiwan University
University of Central Florida
EA Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69df479b1113c054a47a0d05 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2017.168
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: