Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article distinguishes two types of legal technology: ‘cheaper lawyers’ (or simply replacing the cognitive operations of lawyers in their existing domains with technology) and ‘transformative artificial legal cognition’ (or introducing the cognitive operations characteristic of lawyers in contexts where human lawyers cannot economically be deployed at all). It then makes the case for finding advances in egalitarian access to justice and the rule of law primarily in the latter category.
Paul Gowder (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: