Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The argument has two related parts: firstly, we are witnessing an “epistemic” crisis in public spheres that threatens to undermine political agency. This crisis has to do with the massive amounts and speed of information, the processes by which we construct knowledge, as well as the new forms of knowledge deriving from digital technologies. Many developments in information technologies benefit democracy, but there is a growing concern about cognitive dilemmas. Secondly, in the present tumultuous juncture of Western democracies, dominated by the populist revolt, traditional distrust of media has turned into an assault on basic Enlightenment premises, eroding shared understandings of reality and compatible discourse. “Knowledge” becomes legitimated via emotionality. Critical rationality and progressive politics must engage more with these developments.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter Dahlgren (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a087f8fab15ea61dee8e2f7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418819
Peter Dahlgren
Javnost - The Public
Model Driven Solutions (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...