The CardioCoach follow-up tool did not significantly increase the number of heart failure patients reaching maximum guideline-recommended doses of β-blockers and ACE inhibitors compared to usual care.
RCT
Randomized
No
Does the CardioCoach remote monitoring and semiautomatic uptitration system improve guideline-directed medical therapy uptitration in heart failure patients?
A remote monitoring and semiautomatic medication uptitration system for heart failure is feasible and safe with high patient adherence, but did not significantly increase the proportion of patients reaching target doses compared to an intensive usual care program.
BACKGROUND: European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the treatment of heart failure (HF) prescribe uptitration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and β-blockers to the maximum-tolerated, evidence-based dose. Although HF prognosis can drastically improve when correctly implementing these guidelines, studies have shown that they are insufficiently implemented in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to verify whether supplementing the usual care with the CardioCoach follow-up tool is feasible and safe, and whether the tool is more efficient in implementing the guideline recommendations for β-blocker and ACE-I. METHODS: A total of 25 HF patients were randomly assigned to either the usual care control group (n=10) or CardioCoach intervention group (n=15), and observed for 6 months. The CardioCoach follow-up tool is a two-way communication platform with decision support algorithms for semiautomatic remote medication uptitration. Remote monitoring sensors automatically transmit patient's blood pressure, heart rate, and weight on a daily basis. RESULTS: Patients' satisfaction and adherence for medication intake (10,018/10,825, 92.55%) and vital sign measurements (4504/4758, 94.66%) were excellent. However, the number of technical issues that arose was large, with 831 phone contacts (median 41, IQR 32-65) in total. The semiautomatic remote uptitration was safe, as there were no adverse events and no false positive uptitration proposals. Although no significant differences were found between both groups, a higher number of patients were on guideline-recommended medication dose in both groups compared with previous reports. CONCLUSIONS: The CardioCoach follow-up tool for remote uptitration is feasible and safe and was found to be efficient in facilitating information exchange between care providers, with high patient satisfaction and adherence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03294811; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03294811 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6xLiWVsgM).
Smeets et al. (Wed,) conducted a rct in Heart failure. CardioCoach follow-up tool vs. Usual care was evaluated on Number of patients on maximum guideline-recommended β-blocker and ACE-I dose. The CardioCoach follow-up tool did not significantly increase the number of heart failure patients reaching maximum guideline-recommended doses of β-blockers and ACE inhibitors compared to usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: