Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Summary The goal of this research was to evaluate the use of vacuum impregnation ( VI ) and soaking techniques ( ST ) in the application of edible coatings of chitosan and chitosan + lauric acid to minimally processed pumpkins ( MPP ). The vacuum impregnation method led to greater component incorporation (5.9% and 1.75%, respectively) in the pumpkins when compared to soaking and consequently the formation of more uniform, thicker coatings (25.6 and 22.3 μm, respectively). However, VI caused greater changes in pH , acidity, colour and firmness. Relating to water content and carotenoid content, noncoated pumpkins presented greater losses during the storage period, regardless of impregnation method. The pumpkins with edible coatings, regardless of method, presented lower numbers of psychrotrophic micro‐organisms and coliforms during the storage period. Therefore, soaking was considered the best method for the application of chitosan‐based edible coatings to minimally processed pumpkins, as it led to smaller changes in the properties of the product.
Soares et al. (Fri,) studied this question.