Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The broadening of the concept of religion from a substantive, anthropological definition to a more cultural, functional definition has enabled expansion of the study of media, technology and religion into a much wider field of social phenomena. It has Ben argued that this expansion has been so broad and unbounded that the more appropriate question in this field of study is no longer “What is religion?”, but “What isn’t religion?” This paper contends that the time is ripe to set aside a dualistic lens of religion and secular and look instead at embodie human reality as incorporating not only material, empirical and instrumental characteristics but also tanscendental, metaphysical and non-empirical characteristics that also need to be theorised in secular terms.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter Horsfield
MIT University
Journal of Religion Media and Digital Culture
RMIT University
MIT University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter Horsfield (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a128a3f8edbaba0bf677a2a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/25888099-00701004