Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose This paper aims to explore the intermediary roles that public policies play in stimulating government agencies, businesses and civil society to engage in a corporate social responsibility (CSR) agenda. Design/methodology/approach Issues related to decision-making of public policies are increasingly complex. Therefore, analytical hierarchy process has been used to prioritize public policy practices for CSR in the UAE. Data were collected from experts working in businesses and civil society organizations. Findings Findings suggest that businesses and the civil society confirm the importance of standardization and law enforcement public policy practices in issues related to CSR in developing countries. The endorsing style of public policies was the least important approach to encouraging CSR implementation in the UAE. Research limitations/implications Results are derived from a limited amount of empirical data only in one country; therefore, these cannot be generalized. Future research from other countries is needed. Practical implications Outcomes from this study will help the government enhance its role as mediator among all agents and help with designing public policies that encourage adoption of CSR by business firms while maintaining competitiveness in the economy. Originality/value A framework consisting of five public policy categories – mandating, facilitating, partnering, endorsing and empowering roles – and 29 sub-policy practices is introduced. This study provides an important technique for analyzing the importance of public policies in promoting CSR. It offers insights into a population that shapes a CSR agenda.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Saeed Saif Almatrooshi
Matloub Hussain
Mian M. Ajmal
Corporate Governance
Quaid-i-Azam University
Abu Dhabi University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Almatrooshi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69de93e0353721b241b0c49b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-08-2017-0175