Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The PI/PID controller is the most used controller in industry. However, for processes with large time delays, the common belief is that PI and PID controllers have sluggish performance, and that a Smith predictor or similar dead-time compensator can give much improved performance. We claim in this paper that this is a myth. For a given robustness level in terms of the peak sensitivity (Ms), we find that the performance improvement with the Smith predictor is small even for a pure time delay process. For other first-order processes a PID controller is generally better for a given robustness level. In addition, the Smith Predictor is much more sensitive to time delay errors than pi and pid controllers.
Chriss Grimholt Sigurd Skogestad (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: