Peak C-reactive protein during hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction predicted left ventricular dysfunction at follow-up (OR 11.0; 95% CI 3.1-39.5; P<0.001).
Cohort (n=188)
Does C-reactive protein measured during acute MI or at 1 month follow-up better predict left ventricular dysfunction?
Peak CRP during hospitalization for acute MI, but not hsCRP at 1 month, is an independent predictor of subsequent left ventricular dysfunction.
Effect estimate: OR 11.0 (95% CI 3.1-39.5)
p-value: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (MI) invokes a large inflammatory response, which contributes to myocardial repair. HYPOTHESIS: We investigated whether C-reactive protein (CRP) measured during MI vs at 1 month follow-up improves the prediction of left ventricular (LV) function. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 131 consecutive patients with acute MI and without non-cardiovascular causes of inflammation. We correlated admission and peak levels of CRP during hospitalization and high-sensitivity (hs) CRP at 1 month follow-up with markers of cardiac injury. Clinical follow-up and echocardiography for LV function were performed at a mean of 17 months. RESULTS: Median CRP levels were 1.89 mg/L on admission with MI, peaked to 12.10 mg/L during hospitalization and dropped to 1.24 mg/L at 1 month. Although admission CRP levels only weakly correlated with ejection fraction in the acute phase of MI (coefficient -0.164, P = 0.094), peak CRP was significantly related to ejection fraction (coefficient -0.4, P < 0.001), hsTroponin T (0.389, P < 0.001), and white blood cell count (0.389, P < 0.001). hsCRP at 1 month was not related to the extent of acute cardiac injury. These findings were replicated in an independent cohort of 57 patients. Peak CRP predicted LV dysfunction at follow-up (OR 11.0, 3.1-39.5 per log CRP, P < 0.001), persisting after adjustment for infarct size (OR 5.1, 1.1-23.6, P = 0.037), while hsCRP at 1 month was unrelated to LV function at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: hsCRP 1 month post-MI does not relate to acute cardiac injury or LV function at follow-up, but we confirm that peak CRP is an independent predictor of LV dysfunction at follow-up.
Vanhaverbeke et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=188). Peak C-reactive protein (CRP) vs. hsCRP at 1 month was evaluated on Left ventricular dysfunction at follow-up (OR 11.0, 95% CI 3.1-39.5, p=<0.001). Peak C-reactive protein during hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction predicted left ventricular dysfunction at follow-up (OR 11.0; 95% CI 3.1-39.5; P<0.001).