Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of Hardware Performance Counters (HPCs) for detecting pattern of malicious applications. Hardware-supported detectors utilize Machine Learning (ML) classifiers for malware detection by analyzing a large number of HPC features, more than the very limited number of HPC registers available in modern microprocessors. Obtaining more HPCs requires running the application (malware or benign) more than once to collect the required data, which in turn makes the solution less practical for run-time detection of malware. In response to this challenge, in this work, we first identify the critical HPC features required for malware detection. Next, we explore the use of various ML techniques to classify benign and malware applications using the selected HPCs at run-time. Further, we investigate the effectiveness of ensemble learning in improving the performance of ML classifiers. For this purpose, we apply AdaBoost on all general ML classifiers. We thoroughly compare the general and ensemble ML classifiers in terms of accuracy, robustness, performance, and hardware overhead. The experimental results indicate that ensemble learning enhances the performance of malware detection for rule-based and tree-based algorithms up to 13%. However, it diminishes the performance of neural network and Bayesian network-based detectors by 6% and 4%, respectively.
Sayadi et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: