Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Scientific evidence should guide the selection of practice for individuals with disabilities. Scientific evidence, however, must be trustworthy to move special education toward greater empirical certainty and more effective policies and practices. Transparency, openness, and reproducibility increase the trustworthiness of evidence. We propose that researchers in special education adopt emerging open-science reforms, such as preprints, data and materials sharing, preregistration of studies and analysis plans, and Registered Reports. Adoption of these practices will require shifts in cultural norms, guidelines, and incentives. We discuss how adopting open-science practices can advance the quality of research and, consequently, policy and practice in special education.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bryan G. Cook
John Wills Lloyd
David Thomas Mellor
Exceptional Children
University of Virginia
Center for Open Science
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cook et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69daa3f23bc1ef72256844c9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918793138
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: