Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Decreasing MRI scan time is a key factor to increase patient comfort and compliance as well as the productivity of MRI scanners. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: sequences of the lumbar spine. STUDY TYPE: Prospective, cross-sectional, observational. POPULATION: Twenty healthy volunteers and 10 patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: TSE sequence, identical 3D sequences with three different parallel imaging and CS accelerating factors, and 2D TSE sequences as a clinical reference were obtained on a 3T scanner. ASSESSMENT: Three readers evaluated the sequences for delineation of anatomical structures and image quality. A quantitative analysis consisting of root mean square error, structural similarity index, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were performed. The scan times were used to calculate cost differences for each sequence. STATISTICAL TESTS: An analysis of variance with repeated measurements and the Friedman test were used to test for potential differences between the sequences. Post-hoc analysis was made with the chi-squared and Tukey-Kramer test. RESULTS: TSE for volunteers and patients (overall image impression: 4.75 vs. 4.20 P = 0.73 and 4.90 vs. 4.47 P = 0.44). The CS 4.5 scan is 167 seconds (-39%) faster than the 3D and 216.5 seconds (-45%) faster than the 2D sequences. No significant differences was found for the diagnostic certainty in the volunteers and patients between 2D TSE and 3D CS 4.5 (P = 0.89 and P = 0.43). A reduction of scan time to 148 seconds (CS 8) was still rated acceptable for most diagnosis. DATA CONCLUSION: without compromising image quality. The 3D sequences offer comparable diagnostic quality to the clinical 2D standard with less scan time (-45%), potentially increasing the productivity of MRI scanners. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 6 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:e164-e175.
Bratke et al. (Sat,) studied this question.