15 subjects during a lab study
Wearable stress and affect detection using wrist- and chest-worn devices recording physiological and motion data (blood volume pulse, electrocardiogram, electrodermal activity, electromyogram, respiration, body temperature, and three-axis acceleration)
Classification accuracy for affective states (neutral, stress, amusement)surrogate
The WESAD dataset provides a multimodal benchmark for wearable stress and affect detection, achieving up to 93% accuracy for binary stress classification.
Affect recognition aims to detect a person's affective state based on observables, with the goal to e.g. improve human-computer interaction. Long-term stress is known to have severe implications on wellbeing, which call for continuous and automated stress monitoring systems. However, the affective computing community lacks commonly used standard datasets for wearable stress detection which a) provide multimodal high-quality data, and b) include multiple affective states. Therefore, we introduce WESAD, a new publicly available dataset for wearable stress and affect detection. This multimodal dataset features physiological and motion data, recorded from both a wrist- and a chest-worn device, of 15 subjects during a lab study. The following sensor modalities are included: blood volume pulse, electrocardiogram, electrodermal activity, electromyogram, respiration, body temperature, and three-axis acceleration. Moreover, the dataset bridges the gap between previous lab studies on stress and emotions, by containing three different affective states (neutral, stress, amusement). In addition, self-reports of the subjects, which were obtained using several established questionnaires, are contained in the dataset. Furthermore, a benchmark is created on the dataset, using well-known features and standard machine learning methods. Considering the three-class classification problem ( baseline vs. stress vs. amusement ), we achieved classification accuracies of up to 80%,. In the binary case ( stress vs. non-stress ), accuracies of up to 93%, were reached. Finally, we provide a detailed analysis and comparison of the two device locations ( chest vs. wrist ) as well as the different sensor modalities.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Philip Schmidt
Attila Reiss
Robert Duerichen
University of Siegen
Robert Bosch (Germany)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schmidt et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d56e2175589c71d767d416 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3242969.3242985