LV unloading with a 30-minute delay before reperfusion was safe and feasible in anterior STEMI, with similar 30-day MACCE rates compared to immediate reperfusion (12% vs 8%, P=0.99).
RCT (n=50)
randomized
Yes
Does left ventricular unloading with delayed reperfusion improve safety and reduce infarct size compared to immediate reperfusion in patients with anterior STEMI without cardiogenic shock?
50 patients with anterior ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) without cardiogenic shock
Left ventricular unloading using the Impella CP device with a 30-minute delay before reperfusion (U-DR)
Left ventricular unloading using the Impella CP device followed by immediate reperfusion (U-IR)
Composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events at 30 dayssafety
In patients with anterior STEMI without cardiogenic shock, left ventricular unloading with Impella CP and a 30-minute delay before reperfusion is feasible and safe, supporting the need for a larger pivotal trial.
Absolute Event Rate: 12% vs 8%
p-value: p=0.99
Background: In ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), infarct size correlates directly with heart failure and mortality. Preclinical testing has shown that, in comparison with reperfusion alone, mechanically unloading the left ventricle (LV) before reperfusion reduces infarct size and that 30 minutes of unloading activates a cardioprotective program that limits reperfusion injury. The DTU-STEMI pilot trial (Door-To-Unload in STEMI Pilot Trial) represents the first exploratory study testing whether LV unloading and delayed reperfusion in patients with STEMI without cardiogenic shock is safe and feasible. Methods: In a multicenter, prospective, randomized exploratory safety and feasibility trial, we assigned 50 patients with anterior STEMI to LV unloading by using the Impella CP followed by immediate reperfusion (U-IR) versus delayed reperfusion after 30 minutes of unloading (U-DR). The primary safety outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events at 30 days. Efficacy parameters included the assessment of infarct size by using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Results: All patients completed the U-IR (n=25) or U-DR (n=25) protocols with respective mean door-to-balloon times of 72 versus 97 minutes. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event rates were not statistically different between the U-IR versus U-DR groups (8% versus 12%, respectively, P =0.99). In comparison with the U-IR group, delaying reperfusion in the U-DR group did not affect 30-day mean infarct size measured as a percentage of LV mass (15±12% versus 13±11%, U-IR versus U-DR, P =0.53). Conclusions: We report that LV unloading using the Impella CP device with a 30-minute delay before reperfusion is feasible within a relatively short time period in anterior STEMI. The DTU-STEMI pilot trial did not identify prohibitive safety signals that would preclude proceeding to a larger pivotal study of LV unloading before reperfusion. An appropriately powered pivotal trial comparing LV unloading before reperfusion to the current standard of care is required. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03000270.
“As a clinician, I’m going to continue using Impella in cardiogenic shock. In anterior STEMIs, I don’t think we’ll be using this technology.”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Navin K. Kapur
Heart Failure & Transplant
Mohamad Alkhouli
Interventional Cardiology
Tony DeMartini
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
Circulation
Goodwin College
San Salvatore Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kapur et al. (Mon,) conducted a rct in Anterior ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) (n=50). LV unloading with delayed reperfusion (U-DR) vs. LV unloading with immediate reperfusion (U-IR) was evaluated on Composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events at 30 days (p=0.99). LV unloading with a 30-minute delay before reperfusion was safe and feasible in anterior STEMI, with similar 30-day MACCE rates compared to immediate reperfusion (12% vs 8%, P=0.99).
synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb8a0639a85df273859a1e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.118.038269