A random forest model using daily ICD remote monitoring summaries predicted the short-term risk of electrical storm with an AUC of 0.80, performing better than logistic regression (P<0.01).
Observational (n=19,935)
Can machine learning models using daily ICD remote monitoring summaries predict the short-term risk of electrical storms in ICD patients?
Machine learning models using daily ICD remote monitoring summaries can accurately predict the short-term risk of electrical storms without requiring clinical information.
p-value: p=< 0.01
AIMS: Electrical storm (ES) is a serious arrhythmic syndrome that is characterized by recurrent episodes of ventricular arrhythmias. Electrical storm is associated with increased mortality and morbidity despite the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Predicting ES could be essential; however, models for predicting this event have never been developed. The goal of this study was to construct and validate machine learning models to predict ES based on daily ICD remote monitoring summaries. METHODS AND RESULTS: Daily ICD summaries from 19 935 patients were used to construct and evaluate two models logistic regression (LR) and random forest (RF) for predicting the short-term risk of ES. The models were evaluated on the parts of the data not used for model development. Random forest performed significantly better than LR (P < 0.01), achieving a test accuracy of 0.96 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 (vs. an accuracy of 0.96 and an AUC of 0.75). The percentage of ventricular pacing and the daytime activity were the most relevant variables in the RF model. CONCLUSION: The use of large-scale machine learning showed that daily summaries of ICD measurements in the absence of clinical information can predict the short-term risk of ES.
Shakibfar et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Electrical storm in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients (n=19,935). Random forest machine learning model vs. Logistic regression model was evaluated on Short-term risk of electrical storm (p=< 0.01). A random forest model using daily ICD remote monitoring summaries predicted the short-term risk of electrical storm with an AUC of 0.80, performing better than logistic regression (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: