Modified techniques for permanent His-bundle pacing, including a dual-lead method and stability assessment, increased the acute success rate from 84.85% to 99.20% (P<0.001).
Observational (n=310)
No
Patients with narrow QRS requiring pacing (n=310)
Modified techniques for permanent His-bundle pacing (dual-lead method and stability assessment) vs Conventional HBP procedure
Success rate of acute HBP, p=<0.001
Absolute Event Rate: 99.2% vs 84.85%
p-value: p=<0.001
AIMS: High and unstable capture thresholds affect the success rate of permanent His-bundle pacing (HBP). We aimed to introduce the modified techniques during different periods and the corresponding success rate of HBP implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients from a single centre who had intrinsic QRS < 120 ms and HBP attempts were included in the study. The success rate and pacing parameters were described for three periods based on procedural modifications, i.e. Stage 1 using the conventional HBP procedure (August 2012 to May 2013), Stage 2 with addition of the dual-lead method (June 2013 to October 2014), and Stage 3 with the further addition of stability assessment during fixation (November 2014 to October 2016). The patients with successful permanent HBP were followed. A total of 310 patients were included with the average age of 70.3 ± 10.7 years. The success rate of acute HBP was 84.85%, 98.3%, and 99.20% during Stages 1-3, respectively (P < 0.001). The permanent HBP implantation rates increased from 77.3% during Stage 1 to 85.7% during Stage 2 and 89.6% during Stage 3 (P = 0.07). The acute His-bundle capture threshold reduced from 1.30 ± 0.7 V/0.5 ms during Stage 1 to 1.11 ± 0.6 V/0.5 ms during Stage 2 and further to 0.85 ± 0.51 V/0.5 ms during Stage 3 (P < 0.001). At the 12-month follow-up, the mean change in the HBP threshold decreased from 0.60 ± 0.59 V/0.5 ms during Stage 1 to 0.33 ± 0.39 V/0.5 ms during Stage 3 (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The HBP implantation success rate, pacing threshold, and its stability during follow-up were improved by using the dual-lead method and stability assessment techniques.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lan Su
Wenzhou Medical University
Shengjie Wu
Northwestern University
Songjie Wang
Wenzhou Medical University
EP Europace
Wenzhou Medical University
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Su et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Patients with narrow QRS requiring pacing (n=310). Modified techniques for permanent His-bundle pacing (dual-lead method and stability assessment) vs. Conventional HBP procedure was evaluated on Success rate of acute HBP (p=<0.001). Modified techniques for permanent His-bundle pacing, including a dual-lead method and stability assessment, increased the acute success rate from 84.85% to 99.20% (P<0.001).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f22741cf410a932426581 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euy281