Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
BACKGROUND: Mobile apps have become popular resources for mental health support. Availability of information about developers' data security procedures for health apps, specifically those targeting mental health, has not been thoroughly investigated. If people are to use and trust these tools for their mental health, it is crucial we evaluate the transparency and quality around the data practices of these apps. The present study reviewed data security and privacy policies of mobile apps for depression. METHODS: We reviewed mobile apps retrieved from iTunes and Google Play stores in October 2017, using the term "depression", and evaluated the transparency of data handling procedures of those apps. RESULTS: We identified 116 eligible mobile phone apps. Of those, 4% (5/116) received a transparency score of acceptable, 28% (32/116) questionable, and 68% (79/116) unacceptable. Only a minority of the apps (49%) had a privacy policy. The availability of policies differed significantly by platform, with apps from iTunes more likely to have a policy than from the Google Play store. Mobile apps collecting identifiable information were significantly more likely to have a privacy policy (79%) compared to those collecting only non-identifiable information (34%). CONCLUSION: The majority of apps reviewed were not sufficiently transparent with information regarding data security. Apps have great potential to scale mental health resources, providing resources to people unable or reluctant to access traditional face-to-face care, or as an adjunct to treatment. However, if they are to be a reasonable resource, they must be safe, secure, and responsible.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kristen O’Loughlin
University of Washington
Martha Neary
Health Protection Surveillance Centre
Elizabeth C Adkins
Northwestern University
Internet Interventions
Northwestern University
University of California, Irvine
Virginia Commonwealth University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
O’Loughlin et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1023958090e499da60af4b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2018.12.001
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: