Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The aim of the present review was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic performance of one-piece zirconia implants (O-PZI). This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines that addressed the following focused question: What is the overall clinical and radiographic performance of O-PZI? The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register databases were searched. Six clinical studies were included. For studies evaluating O-PZI compared with one-piece titanium implants, zirconia implants showed higher crestal bone loss (CBL) in both the studies. However, one study demonstrated a high failure rate compared to titanium dental implants, while one study demonstrated comparable survival rates between zirconia and titanium dental implants. For studies evaluating O-PZI for the restoration of single crown and fixed dental prostheses, O-PZI showed comparable bone loss and survival rates for single crowns and fixed dental prostheses. Two studies were included that compared O-PZI with two-piece zirconia (T-PZI). One study showed a higher CBL and low survival rate for O-PZI compared to T-PZI, whereas the other study demonstrated comparable CBL and survival rates between O-PZI and T-PZI. It is still debatable whether O-PZI demonstrate better clinical performance when compared with titanium implants or two-piece design.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Aws S. ArRejaie
King Saud University
Rana S Al‐Hamdan
King Saud University
Ghadeer Basunbul
King Abdulaziz University
Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry
King Saud University
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University
King Abdul Aziz University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
ArRejaie et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d90301d2f7327e70ae4c68 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12384
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: