The understanding of cardiac pacemaking has evolved from the discovery of the funny current to a coupled-clock system, paving the way for biological pacing using stem cells or transcription factors.
This review summarizes the historical evolution and current understanding of cardiac pacemaking mechanisms, including the coupled-clock system and future directions in biological pacing.
Initially, diastolic depolarization in Purkinje fibers was explained by deactivation of gK2 in the presence of inward current. Weakness of the hypothesis was a too negative reversal potential, sensitivity to external Na+ ions, existence of K+ depletion, and fake current during hyperpolarizing clamps. The development of a sinus node preparation of almost microscopic dimensions allowing uniform voltage clamps created new possibilities. Three different groups discovered in this improved node preparation an hyperpolarization induced time-dependent inward current, with a reversal potential positive to the resting potential, carried by a mixture of Na+ and K+ ions. A new current, If, or funny current was born. It is not the only pacemaker current. The following sequence of currents (membrane clock) has been proposed: diastole starts as a consequence of IK deactivation and If activation; followed by activation of the T-type Ca2+ current, Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release from the SR, and activation of sodium-calcium exchange current with further depolarization of the membrane till threshold of the L-type Ca2+current is reached. The release of Ca2+ can also occur spontaneously independently from a T-type Ca2+current. The system acts then as a primary intracellular clock. The review is completed by description of an evolution in the direction of biological pacing using induced pluripotent stem cells or transcription factors. See also: https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13860 & https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13861
Edward Carmeliet (Tue,) conducted a review in Cardiac pacemaking. The understanding of cardiac pacemaking has evolved from the discovery of the funny current to a coupled-clock system, paving the way for biological pacing using stem cells or transcription factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: