Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
PURPOSE: To describe the amount, range, and key characteristics (e.g., publication years, methods, topics) of the person-centered rehabilitation literature in adults with physical impairments. METHOD: Following the published scoping review protocol, papers were identified through: three major databases, snowball searches and expert consultation. Two independent reviewers have identified English-language papers on adult person-centered rehabilitation according to six pre-defined inclusion categories - theoretical, quantitative and qualitive research papers are included; and then have extracted their key characteristics (e.g., aims, methods, participants). Descriptive statistics, regression and content analyses were used to synthesize the results. RESULTS: = 67) studied implementation of person-centered rehabilitation approaches, including its effect. CONCLUSION: This scoping review synthesizes key characteristics and publication trends in the person-centered rehabilitation literature on adults with physical impairments, a growing but unchartered territory thus far. This large and diverse body of literature can ground further person-centered rehabilitation practices and research, including toward building a transdisciplinary, trans-service model of person-centered rehabilitation.Implications for rehabilitationThe person-centered rehabilitation literature on adults with physical impairments, especially the empirical one, has been growing significantly over time, despite inequitably distributed per countries.Rehabilitation stakeholders, including practitioners, have a growing amount of literature in which they can rely for the operationalization and implementation of person-centered rehabilitation approaches into routine practice.Based on our work, person-centered rehabilitation emerges as a practice requirement that cuts across professional and other rehabilitation silos.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tiago S. Jesus
Northwestern University
Felicity Bright
Auckland University of Technology
Cátia S. Pinho
Grove City College
Disability and Rehabilitation
University of Toronto
University of Lisbon
Auckland University of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jesus et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0388d1252f82193957d817 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1668483