ECG signal processing methods significantly impacted reconstruction accuracy, with baseline drift removal increasing the magnitude of reconstructed electrograms up to four-fold compared to no processing (p<0.05).
Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) accuracy (n=1)
ECG signal processing (high-frequency noise removal, baseline drift removal, signal averaging) vs Unprocessed torso signals
Mean RMS voltage of reconstructed electrograms, p=<0.05
p-value: p=<0.05
The inverse problem of electrocardiography is ill-posed. Errors in the model such as signal noise can impact the accuracy of reconstructed cardiac electrical activity. It is currently not known how sensitive the inverse problem is to signal processing techniques. To evaluate this, experimental data from a Langendorff-perfused pig heart (n=1) suspended in a human-shaped torso-tank was used. Different signal processing methods were applied to torso potentials recorded from 128 electrodes embedded in the tank surface. Processing methods were divided into three categories i) high-frequency noise removal ii) baseline drift removal and iii) signal averaging, culminating in n=72 different signal sets. For each signal set, the inverse problem was solved and reconstructed signals were compared to those directly recorded by the sock around the heart. ECG signal processing methods had a dramatic effect on reconstruction accuracy. In particular, removal of baseline drift significantly impacts the magnitude of reconstructed electrograms, while the presence of high-frequency noise impacts the activation time derived from these signals (p<0.05).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Laura Bear
Université de Bordeaux
Yeşim Serinağaoğlu Doğrusöz
Ankara University
Jana Švehlíková
Slovak Academy of Sciences
Computing in cardiology
University of Utah
Boston Children's Hospital
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bear et al. (Sun,) conducted a other in Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) accuracy (n=1). ECG signal processing (high-frequency noise removal, baseline drift removal, signal averaging) vs. Unprocessed torso signals was evaluated on Mean RMS voltage of reconstructed electrograms (p=<0.05). ECG signal processing methods significantly impacted reconstruction accuracy, with baseline drift removal increasing the magnitude of reconstructed electrograms up to four-fold compared to no processing (p<0.05).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ec37c1c5e2d2319f9d5a5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2018.070