A random forest machine learning algorithm predicted clinically relevant tachycardia episodes from vital sign time series in ICU patients with an accuracy of 0.847 and an AUC of 0.921.
Observational (n=2,809)
No
Can machine learning algorithms using multi-granular vital sign time series predict upcoming clinically relevant tachycardia episodes in ICU patients?
Machine learning algorithms applied to continuous vital sign data can accurately predict clinically relevant tachycardia episodes up to 75 minutes before onset in ICU patients.
Effect estimate: AUC 0.921
Tachycardia is a strong though non-specific marker of cardiovascular stress that proceeds hemodynamic instability. We designed a predictive model of tachycardia using multi-granular intensive care unit (ICU) data by creating a risk score and dynamic trajectory. A subset of clinical and numerical signals were extracted from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II database. A tachycardia episode was defined as heart rate ≥ 130/min lasting for ≥ 5 min, with ≥ 10% density. Regularized logistic regression (LR) and random forest (RF) classifiers were trained to create a risk score for upcoming tachycardia. Three different risk score models were compared for tachycardia and control (non-tachycardia) groups. Risk trajectory was generated from time windows moving away at 1 min increments from the tachycardia episode. Trajectories were computed over 3 hours leading up to the episode for three different models. From 2809 subjects, 787 tachycardia episodes and 707 control periods were identified. Patients with tachycardia had increased vasopressor support, longer ICU stay, and increased ICU mortality than controls. In model evaluation, RF was slightly superior to LR, which accuracy ranged from 0.847 to 0.782, with area under the curve from 0.921 to 0.842. Risk trajectory analysis showed average risks for tachycardia group evolved to 0.78 prior to the tachycardia episodes, while control group risks remained < 0.3. Among the three models, the internal control model demonstrated evolving trajectory approximately 75 min before tachycardia episode. Clinically relevant tachycardia episodes can be predicted from vital sign time series using machine learning algorithms.
Yoon et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Intensive care unit patients at risk of tachycardia and cardiorespiratory instability (n=2,809). Machine learning algorithms (Random Forest and Logistic Regression) was evaluated on Prediction of tachycardia episodes (Random Forest at lag 0) (AUC 0.921). A random forest machine learning algorithm predicted clinically relevant tachycardia episodes from vital sign time series in ICU patients with an accuracy of 0.847 and an AUC of 0.921.