Highlights the critical role of chronic stress, socioeconomic adversity, and racial/sex discrimination in driving worsening cardiovascular disease trends among young Black women.
eart disease remains the leading cause of death among women in the United States. Significant racial and sex disparities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) persist, and the high risk among young and middle-aged black women, in particular, is becoming increasingly apparent. In comparison with white women, black women have more CVD risk factors, develop CVD earlier, and have higher CVD mortality rates. 1 Furthermore, despite overall declines in CVD mortality rates over the past several decades, black women 35 to 54 years of age are experiencing a concerning slowing of annual declines in mortality. hese realities beg 2 critical questions. First, what is driving the worsening CVD trends in young black women? Second, what can we do about it? The answer to the first question is not entirely clear, although we know some of the likely explanations. Complex interactions between genetic and environmental factors contribute to CVD risk, and powerful social justice inequities are exacerbating these processes and contributing to disparities. There is no question about how we have arrived at this unfortunate reality. Throughout American history, black women have known the art of juggling all too well. From slavery to the present day, black women have remained the matriarchs and pillars of their families. Through the war on drugs and mass incarceration, black women have continued to uphold their responsibilities as caregivers, often caring for grandchildren and extended families, often on their own, while maintaining jobs and careers, marriages, and relationships among so many other things. The added burden of racial and sex discrimination and of socioeconomic adversity has contributed to a dangerous environmental exposure with effects that reach across generations: chronic stress.
Kalinowski et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: