Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Our essay discusses an AI process developed for making art (AICAN), and the issues AI creativity raises for understanding art and artists in the 21st century. Backed by our training in computer science (Elgammal) and art history (Mazzone), we argue for the consideration of AICAN’s works as art, relate AICAN works to the contemporary art context, and urge a reconsideration of how we might define human and machine creativity. Our work in developing AI processes for art making, style analysis, and detecting large-scale style patterns in art history has led us to carefully consider the history and dynamics of human art-making and to examine how those patterns can be modeled and taught to the machine. We advocate for a connection between machine creativity and art broadly defined as parallel to but not in conflict with human artists and their emotional and social intentions of art making. Rather, we urge a partnership between human and machine creativity when called for, seeing in this collaboration a means to maximize both partners’ creative strengths.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Marian Mazzone
Ahmed Elgammal
Arts
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
College of Charleston
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mazzone et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d947b09a6164e50fa3c709 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010026