Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
For nearly 15 years, significant efforts have been directed toward the computational design of electrocatalysts for a variety of important reactions. Despite conspicuous discoveries, enhancing electrocatalysts is still a feat rather than a routine task. This could be due to the fact that computational materials design is often guided by heuristic rules. Here we outline a systematic procedure for the optimization of electrocatalysts using two independent parameters: δ, which is restricted by adsorption-energy scaling relations, and ε, which is scaling-free. Taking the prototypical oxygen evolution reaction as a case study, we mathematically show that, contrary to the widespread idea, stabilizing *OOH with respect to *OH is not a universal principle to go beyond the top of the activity volcano. Conversely, the δ−ε optimization lowers the calculated overpotentials in nearly all analyzed cases, suggesting that “electrocatalytic symmetry” is the only general thermodynamic recipe for optimal electrocatalysis. Using δ−ε analyses, screening studies can identify (1) the most promising materials, (2) the problematic reaction intermediates, and (3) the materials’ ease of optimization.
Govindarajan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: