Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Organisational digital transformation (ODT) is a field of growing interest in practice and academia. Further, a disparity between how information technology (IT) leaders and non-IT leaders perceive the factors leading to successful ODT initiatives has been cited. A set of empirically tested ODT assessment instruments will enhance leaders’ decision-making when implementing ODT initiatives. Objectives: This research attempts to: (1) identify the key internal factors of successful ODT initiatives; and (2) confirm whether there is, as has been suggested, a difference between the way IT managers and non-IT managers perceive these factors. Method: A questionnaire consisting of 36 potential underlying factors was formulated, based on the existing literature and additional insights. A prescreening process ensured each survey participant met the selection criteria. From a total of 95 participants who completed the survey, 45 were IT executives and 50 were non-IT executives. Quantitative analyses were conducted to identify the key underlying factors and ascertain whether IT and non-IT leaders hold differing perceptions of these factors. Results: Factor analysis identified four categories of factors of a successful ODT initiative: (1) customer centricity, (2) governance, (3) innovation and (4) resource attainment. Further, the analysis revealed that IT and non-IT managers hold similar perceptions on the key factors affecting the overall ODT success. Conclusion: This research provides empirical evidence that paves the way towards a reliable ODT assessment instrument and refutes claims that IT and non-IT leaders hold contrasting views on these factors.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ntandoyethu S.M. Mhlungu
Jeff Y.J. Chen
Peter John Alkema
South African journal of information management
University of Pretoria
Gordon State College
National Australia Bank
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mhlungu et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ae7a449c3147e10460b4c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v21i1.995
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: