Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Qubit, operator, and gate resources required for the digitization of lattice ^4 scalar field theories onto quantum computers are considered, building upon the foundational work by Jordan et al. Quantum Inf. Comput. 14, 1014 (2014) ; Science 336, 1130 (2012), with a focus towards noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. The Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem, introduced in this context by Macridin et al. Phys. Rev. A 98, 042312 (2018) building on the work of Somma Quantum Inf. Comput. 16, 1125 (2016), provides a guide with which to evaluate the efficacy of two field-space bases, the eigenstates of the field operator, as used by Jordan et al. , and eigenstates of a harmonic oscillator, to describe (0+1) - and (d+1) -dimensional scalar field theory. We show how techniques associated with improved actions, which are heavily utilized in lattice QCD calculations to systematically reduce lattice-spacing artifacts, can be used to reduce the impact of the field digitization in ^4, but are found to be inferior to a complete digitization improvement of the Hamiltonian using a quantum Fourier transform. When the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem is satisfied, digitization errors scale as |log|log|₃₈₆|||nₐ (number of qubits describing the field at a given spatial site) for the low-lying states, leaving the familiar power-law lattice-spacing and finite-volume effects that scale as |log|₋₀ₓₓ||Nₐ (total number of qubits in the simulation). For localized (delocalized) field-space wave functions, it is found that nₐ4 (7) qubits per spatial lattice site are sufficient to reduce theoretical digitization errors below error contributions associated with approximation of the time-evolution operator and noisy implementation on near-term quantum devices. Only classical computing resources have been used to obtain the results presented in this work.
Klco et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: