Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Chest X-rays are the most commonly performed, cost-effective imaging tests ordered by physicians. A clinically validated AI that can reliably separate normals from abnormals can be invaluble in low-resource settings. The aim of this study was to develop and a deep learning system to detect various abnormalities seen on a chest-ray. Methods: A deep learning system was trained on 2. 3 million chest X-rays their corresponding radiology reports to identify various abnormalities on a Chest X-ray. The system was tested against - 1. A three-radiologist on an independent, retrospectively collected set of 2000-rays (CQ2000) 2. Radiologist reports on a separate validation set of 100, 000 (CQ100k). The primary accuracy measure was area under the ROC curve (AUC), separately for each abnormality and for normal versus abnormal scans.: On the CQ2000 dataset, the deep learning system demonstrated an AUC of0. 92 (CI 0. 91-0. 94) for detection of abnormal scans, and AUC (CI) of0. 96 (0. 94-0. 98), 0. 96 (0. 94-0. 98), 0. 95 (0. 87-1), 0. 95 (0. 92-0. 98), 0. 93 (0. 90-0. 96), 0. 89 (0. 83-0. 94), 0. 91 (0. 87-0. 96), 0. 94 (0. 93-0. 96), 0. 98 (0. 97-1) for the detection of blunted costophrenic angle, cardiomegaly, , consolidation, fibrosis, hilar enlargement, nodule, opacity and pleural. The AUCs were similar on the larger CQ100k dataset except for normals where the AUC was 0. 86 (0. 85-0. 86). Interpretation: Our study that a deep learning algorithm trained on a large, well-labelled can accurately detect multiple abnormalities on chest X-rays. As these improve in accuracy, applying deep learning to widen the reach of chest-ray interpretation and improve reporting efficiency will add tremendous value radiology workflows and public health screenings globally.
Putha et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: