Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We study trade-offs between accuracy and privacy in the context of linear queries over histograms. This is a rich class of queries that includes contingency tables and range queries and has been the focus of a long line of work. For a given set of d linear queries over a database x ∈ RN, we seek to find the differentially private mechanism that has the minimum mean squared error. For pure differential privacy, 5, 32 give an O (log2 d) approximation to the optimal mechanism. Our first contribution is to give an efficient O (log2 d) approximation guarantee for the case of (ε, δ) -differential privacy. Our mechanism adds carefully chosen correlated Gaussian noise to the answers. We prove its approximation guarantee relative to the hereditary discrepancy lower bound of 44, using tools from convex geometry. We next consider the sparse case when the number of queries exceeds the number of individuals in the database, i. e. when d > n Δ |x|1. The lower bounds used in the previous approximation algorithm no longer apply --- in fact better mechanisms are known in this setting 7, 27, 28, 31, 49. Our second main contribution is to give an efficient (ε, δ) -differentially private mechanism that, for any given query set A and an upper bound n on |x|1, has mean squared error within polylog (d, N) of the optimal for A and n. This approximation is achieved by coupling the Gaussian noise addition approach with linear regression over the l1 ball. Additionally, we show a similar polylogarithmic approximation guarantee for the optimal ε-differentially private mechanism in this sparse setting. Our work also shows that for arbitrary counting queries, i. e. A with entries in 0, 1, there is an ε-differentially private mechanism with expected error ~O (√n) per query, improving on the ~O (n2/3) bound of 7 and matching the lower bound implied by 15 up to logarithmic factors.
Nikolov et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: